So I got myself a K1300R ( will post a pic when i remember how to upload photos on this forum)
To answer other people in case they are curious on the difference between the S and the R:
- Ergonomics/driving position is pretty much the same, yes the R's bar are a bit higher but it's not that marked and the R isn't as up as most naked bike are , it remains more sports touring. 5 years laters, I am getting older though, the forward position is less comfortable than I remembered, need to work on my core as not used to so much weight on the wrists
- Gearing is def short on the R, you notice it on the motorway where it feels like 6th should be a big longer but the plus side is that in town you can go down to very low speed without needing to change gear ( which the S can already do to an extend) and you are more often in the power band
- Protection is less on the motorway but again way better than most naked bike or for example my R1200R. it's easy to drive at 70mph, i don't have to hold on to the bar like more traditional naked bike
- Driving: it feels easier to flick from side to side potentially due to more leverage, slightly narrower tyre and less weight. I had Pirelli GT vs Michelin PR5 now but dont think the tyres would make such an effect
So overall it's very very similar, for my mostly town usage the R works a bit better for me than the S as I am happy to trade less protection for easier to flick and shorter gearing.
Now comparing to my LC R1200R, I am still amazed at how much more power the K has, the R just doesnt have the same feeling of being powered by some kind of fighter jet engine whilst being way more docile at low RPM. However the R is much easier to flick around and surprisingly more comfortable: the K has a better seat but the ESA isnt quite as good and it doesn't soak up bump as well as the R. Fuel efficiency is also a lot better on the R compared to the K
Overall happy to be back on a K although it's reminding me on a daily basis that I am not as fit and young as I was 5 years ago